After two odd years in the middle of what should have been his prime,
Dwight Howard gets a second chance in a new environment. Can he still be
the player he was in 2011?
Dwight Howard's fall from grace has been truly odd. Just two years ago,
he finished No. 2 in MVP voting. Sure, that was the asterisk year in
which LeBron James was left off of some ballots because of, one
imagines, The Decision. But it was a 23-14 season and a third
Defensive Player of the Year award season for Howard. Yes, 23-14 --
superlative per-game numbers for anyone -- plus the DPOY. When teams draft raw big men impossibly high, that's what they are begging to get.
But then it all fell apart: the circumstances around his brewing free
agency wrecked Orlando's 2011-12 season even before Howard's back gave
out, requiring surgery. The subsequent offseason trade to the Lakers set
up the unique experience of Los Angeles getting one of the top players
in the world, and in him a star who adores the spotlight, only to see
him abandon ship. Someday we'll look back on the history of the Lakers
and Howard leaving at first opportunity will look like a typo.
That's not what usually happens to the Lakers. That's what usually
happens to other teams to the benefit of the Lakers.
Alas, Howard never meshed with Kobe Bryant or Mike D'Antoni, and for
once in his professional life he made a swift, decisive resolution to
join the Rockets. And now, we find out if the 27-year-old edition of
Dwight Howard is who he was the past two seasons -- a whole lot of
drama, sub-elite production -- or if he's still of kin to the Dwight
Howard who, again, was No. 2 in MVP voting just two years ago. The
Rockets' season rides on the answer to that question.
This Rockets club is easily as talented or more talented than the
2008-09 Magic team Howard led to the NBA Finals. Orlando had a peaking
Hedo Turkoglu and Rashard Lewis; James Harden is currently better than
either ever was, and Houston's depth is pretty solid if lacking in
reliable supplemental stars. (Which is to say that Chandler Parsons is
pretty good, but he's even better for having had Carlos Delfino and
Francisco Garcia behind him.) There is a deficit on the bench when it
comes to coaching, however, and not because Kevin McHale is clearly a
lesser game manager than Stan Van Gundy. It's more because S.V.G. had
experience building a system around Howard by '08-09, whereas McHale is
coming in fresh. In fact, in McHale's coaching career, he's never
had a post player of this caliber to build around. (His bench work in
Minnesota included Al Jefferson and Kevin Love, but it was also abrupt
and tanked by a multitude of other realities.)
The comparison between Howard's best teams of the past and this
Rockets roster is primarily about how Howard plays, and how Howard plays
with Harden. I doubt there will be any issue; as if we don't have proof
that Harden can be superb when a second or even third weapon is on the
floor. The idea that Harden will bristle for having to share the
spotlight with Howard based on the fact that Harden left Oklahoma City
is wholly unfounded; Harden was traded, and the reason was that
the Thunder wanted to pay him less than what he was worth. OKC wanted an
eight-figure discount. Harden declined. OKC flipped him for assets. All
else is conjecture.
Howard has been tagged with those questions -- about sharing the
spotlight -- as well, and his exit from L.A. didn't help. The rumor mill
suggested he bristled at the idea of genuflecting before Kobe Bryant
for two or three more years, years which happen to be the age-projected
prime of his career. But that may have been more about Kobe, about the
dismissal of Mike Brown and the hiring of D'Antoni, about the L.A. power
structure specifically. I, for one, refuse to curse this new
partnership between Howard and Harden before any evidence of its
impending failure presents itself. If the duo fails because of
personality conflicts, role jockeying or whatever, I want to see it
happen before I prepare a eulogy.
In the meantime, in preparation of what's to come in Houston, we
remember Howard at his height, and wonder if those summits will be
conquered again or left in our increasingly distant memories of a
superstar whose career took a couple of weird, unfortunate turns and
never recovered.
No comments:
Post a Comment